BLOG
Interviews
Brutally Honest
Technique Videos
Back to Basics
Pressure Points
Practical Ninjutsu
Practical StickFighting
Practical Karate
Practical Tae
Kwon Do
Practical
Kempo
Practical
JuJitsu
Practical NHB
The Pen
Videos
Mixed
What's New
Links
Disclaimer |
Zoltan
Dienes
Zoltan is an experimental psychologist at Sussex
University, with 32 published scientific articles and co-author
of a book reviewing research in his area. He has appeared on British
national television, radio, and newspapers and German national television
about his research. He has also been a statistical consultant for
several years to two drug companies (Wyeth and Cerebrus). He has
been training in karate for 22 years, and teaches Kyusho as part
of regular training at his club, the University of Sussex Shotokan
Karate Club.
Mike
Flanagan
Mike is currently in his final year of a three-year
course in Shiatsu and uses TCM in this work. Mike is currently a
student of Matsumura Shorin Ryu, and has been studying Kyusho Jitsu
for four years.
In recent years the subject of 'pressure point fighting' or kyusho-jutsu
has caused a good degree of excitement, and also some controversy,
in the world of martial arts. There are practitioners who endeavour
to use pressure points in every technique they do, and there are
others who think that pressure points would not work in a real situation,
and avoid them altogether. The authors are both firm believers in
the use of pressure points to increase the effectiveness of already
good technique.
Having accepted the usefulness of pressure points one is then bound
to ask "What are they?", "How do they work?" and "How best can I
use them?". A popular way of explaining how pressure points work
is to describe them in terms of Chinese medicine. Traditional Chinese
Medicine (TCM) is a system of thought that is at least 2,500 years
old. Some aspects of medicine have been associated with martial
arts in the orient for hundreds of years. The reasons for this are
obvious - it is clearly useful for martial arts teachers to have
some experience of addressing the kind of training injuries that
martial arts students are likely to encounter. Such knowledge is
likely to have been passed down through the centuries along with
the martial arts being taught. It seems only natural then that the
principles and theories of Chinese medicine might be used to explain
the effectiveness of certain aspects of martial arts. This is nowhere
more evident than in the field of pressure-point fighting - in which
nowadays the names for the 'pressure-points' are often taken directly
from the tsubo's, or vital points, of Chinese medicine. In this
manner, a number of theories have been taken directly from Chinese
medicine and applied to martial arts. But is this an appropriate
application of those theories? The main focus of Chinese medicine
is to address imbalance in human beings, striving towards the creation
of harmony and therefore the absence of disease. For the TCM practitioner
this often involves an extensive examination of the person, and
a holistic and extended course of therapy. But it is far from obvious
how these theories should be applied to the problem of harming rather
than healing, using martial art techniques rather than needles or
massage, finishing a fight in seconds rather than a course of therapy
over months. Many people have attempted to apply the concepts of
TCM to martial arts without demonstrating that the principles themselves
were adding anything useful to the effective techniques they employed.
We considered that this was a subject worthy of more rigorous investigation
and so, beginning in 1998, set about designing a number of experiments
to test the validity of some of the ways in which concepts of Chinese
medicine had been applied to the martial arts.
The first two experiments were designed by Zoltan Dienes; the latter
two by Zoltan Dienes and Mike Flanagan.
In traditional Chinese thought there are five phases or elements
that exist in nature, and each element has an associated colour.
These are blue (or black) for water, green for wood, red for fire,
yellow for earth and white for metal. Some martial artists believe
that envisaging a particular colour, or even imaging 'flowing' that
colour into an opponent, will enhance the effect of attacking particular
pressure points. The colour is chosen in accordance with the Five
Elements so as to provide maximum disruption to the energy of that
point. Points lie along channels called meridians; ten of the twelve
meridians are associated with a particular element. Thus, most points
are associated with one of the elements, and hence with a certain
colour. In 1998 Zoltan attended a seminar in which the instructor
demonstrated this principle using the wrist lock known as nikkyo,
or s-lock. Anyone who has been on the receiving end of nikkyo can
attest to how painful the experience is! The seminar instructor
demonstrated the lock and showed how envisaging 'flowing yellow'
into the opponent enhanced the lock and made it more effective;
he said that flowing the colour would mean people could use half
the amount of force to get the same reaction. Indeed, many people
attending the seminar were surprised at how well this worked. Zoltan
reproduced this session with 2 groups of karate students. First
he taught the whole group how to apply nikkyo. Then he taught Group
A that flowing red would increase the effectiveness of the lock
and that flowing blue would decrease its effectiveness. Group B
were taught the exact opposite: blue would increase the effectiveness
of the lock and red would decrease it. When questioned at the end
of the session each group found that what they had been told appeared
to be true. Those who were told that flowing red would enhance the
lock found that to be the case, the other group found that flowing
blue was more effective - in fact, they found the colour they THOUGHT
should work better to be about twice as effective as the other colour,
just as had been suggested to them by Zoltan. The only conclusion
that can be drawn from this is that it is not the colour that is
important but the students' belief in its effectiveness: positive
thinking and commitment to your technique will make it a more effective
technique.
Each of the Five Elements also has an associated musical note.
Nikkyo (s-lock) has again been used to demonstrate that vibration
at certain frequencies can enhance a technique's effectiveness.
This is achieved by vibrating the arm very slightly, at a particular
speed, whilst applying the lock. It should be noted that these movements
are much smaller than the random movement some practitioners employ
to confuse an individual who is succeeding in resisting the application
of a lock. As in the previous experiment 2 groups of karate students
were taught to apply the lock with and without vibration. Group
A were taught that vibration would enhance the lock. Group B were
taught that the lock was best performed as smoothly as possible
and that vibration would detract from its effectiveness. Both groups
found their experience matched their expectations. Group A did indeed
find that vibration was helpful in applying this lock, group B found
that vibration detracted from its effectiveness, roughly by the
factor of two that was suggested to them. Again it must be concluded
that each student's belief with regard to vibration was far more
important than the actual vibration itself.
The central theme of the Five Elements consists of the relationships
between the elements themselves. These relationships are expressed
as 2 cycles. The creative cycle states that water creates wood,
wood creates fire, fire creates earth, earth creates metal and metal
creates water, thus completing the cycle. The control cycle states
that water controls fire, fire controls metal, metal controls wood,
wood controls earth and earth controls water, again completing the
cycle. Amongst those who use Five Elements in order to select relevant
pressure points to attack, the most widely used and commonly agreed
principle is the use of the control cycle, sometimes referred to
as the destructive cycle by martial artists. The basic idea is that
if one attacks a vital point on, say, a fire meridian then this
will affect the flow of qi, or energy, in the metal meridians, as
fire controls metal. Therefore an attack to a point on a metal meridian
will have a much greater effect on the energy in that meridian IF
it has been preceded by an attack to a fire meridian. To put this
in plain English: grabbing Heart 6 (fire) on the wrist and striking
Large Intestine 18 (metal) on the neck is more likely to knock the
person out than simply striking Large Intestine 18 on its own. As
another example, consider the photos below. In response to being
grabbed, uke first strikes Large Intestine 10, a metal point. This
cause tori to bend in such a way that Gall Bladder 20 (a wood point)
is exposed. Metal controls wood in the destructive cycle, and by
striking Gall Bladder 20, uke can easily knock tori out.
This sequence illustrates the effectiveness of a technique that
follows the destructive cycle. But was it effective BECAUSE it follows
the destructive cycle? Consider the following sequence. It is similar
to the last but this time, uke strikes first a metal point (Large
Intestine 10) and then an earth point (Stomach 5). This would also
produce a knockout, but the destructive cycle is not followed.
Does it matter at all what sequence of elements is followed? In
order test the validity of the theory that following the destructive
cycle is particularly effective, we decided to compare the effectiveness
of the destructive (control) cycle against the creative cycle. This
was a carried out as a double blind controlled study in accordance
with accepted experimental methods. The study was 'blind' in the
sense that both the person attacking the vital points and the subjects
being attacked were unaware of the relationships we were attempting
to test. We also 'controlled' for various other factors that might
affect the results. For example, we ensured that the only TCM relationship
between each pair of points was that of either the creative or the
destructive cycle. Some factors could not be controlled directly
but were 'randomised' - this means that if you test a large enough
group of people under different random conditions then these random
variations can be accounted for. Each test subject was pressed once
on one point, followed immediately by being pressed on a second
point. The subject was then asked to give a rating of the pain experienced
when the second point was pressed. Each subject was tested twice
in each session - on one side of the body using the destructive
cycle and on the other using the creative cycle (the order of both
left and right AND destructive or creative was randomised). This
was repeated for 28 test subjects, before going on to repeat the
whole experiment for another element. All 5 elements were tested
in this manner, giving a total of 280 individual pain ratings. These
were subjected to a rigorous statistical analysis and the conclusion
was as follows: there was no significant difference between the
pain caused by the destructive cycle and that caused by the creative
cycle. It did appear, however, that activating points on one side
of the body did result in more pain when points on the other side
of the body were activated. This does give at least some credence
to the claim by some instructors that stimulating a point activates
the same point on the other side of the body. However, the mechanism
that produced this increase in pain is still unclear.
In a further experiment we obtained pain ratings after a point
- the target point - had been hit by itself, or when it was struck
immediately after a setup point had been struck. In one condition,
the setup and target points were "shu" points, which are the points
on the extremities used almost exclusively by acupuncturists to
manipulate qi according to the Five Elements. The two points we
used were specially selected by us so that the qi imbalance caused
by the setup strike should be aggravated by the target strike, according
to the destructive cycle. In the other condition, the setup point
and target point followed the destructive cycle, but they were not
shu points. We tested 18 subjects in both conditions using the same
double blind procedure as the previous experiment. We found that
the setup did NOT increase the pain produced by the target strike,
not even when shu points were used. In fact, the pain of the target
strike was lower (although not significantly) after a setup strike
had been given rather than no setup at all. So even in this special
case, where the destructive cycle might be considered especially
useful, there was still no evidence of its usefulness.
Having applied a rigorous statistical approach to testing some
of the central principles of Chinese medicine as applied to pressure
point fighting we have found no evidence whatsoever to support their
usefulness in this setting. This is not to say that some vital points
can't be used together to increase their effectiveness. It simply
means that Chinese medicine theory has not thus far shown itself
to be a useful model for predicting which points do work well together.
However, there is at this stage a relative lack of rigorous research
into this area. We would welcome therefore the input of other researchers
into this field. Anyone wishing to contact the authors regarding
any aspect of these experiments can do so given the contact details
above.
Full details of all the above experiments are reported in the other
articles available here.
|